Please complete the same sections that you completed in the Proposal Intent portion of this application (Law Enforcement Officers, Youth/Adults, Parents/Caregivers). In the sections that are not applicable to your proposal, please use N/A or 0 as answers.
Please note that we define a result not as people reading materials or sitting through a workshop but as something they gain from the activity. Please insure that the result is either a direct gain in one of our focus areas (e.g., a given number youth or adults that implement at least one new internet safety approach) or a change in condition or behavior that is a good predictor of that success longer term. At a workshop, you might not be able to state specific changes made by participants after they leave, but you can focus on demonstrated learnings or commitments that in turn predict those gains longer term. |
|
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
|
Click here for specific instructions on creating your result statement
Enter your results statement here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
750 character maximum
|
This number is a subset of the overall number of Law Enforcement Officers you plan to serve in your program from question 1 above. For example, if your program/project serves 100 participants overall and you anticipate that 50% of those served will achieve the program result you stated, the number of people reaching the desired program/project result would be 50.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
|
We simply want to know what information or evidence you will use to verify that your stated result in question 2 above has been achieved. You may well be able to use existing data bases or rely on existing measuring instruments. Or you may be able to use observations and reports by others, or in some cases self-reported behaviors.
Enter your verification here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
2000 character maximum
|
We believe that our return on grant investment is not the result you achieve. It is the difference between your result and what would have happened without you. It is rarely the case that no one you serve would have achieved a result given other progress and forces at work.
We are not asking you to do original research. Just rely on whatever information exists about outcomes at the most specific level you can get it. Past rates of literacy or academic achievement in a school or neighborhood beat a district or a city. And a city beats a state or the nation. If no information exists, use the most educated guesses you can find - for example from teachers or guidance counselors if your focus is schools.
|
Please enter the number of Law Enforcement Officers that would reach the desired result without this program/project.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers
|
You may have benefits to add such as:
- The "life cycle" cost savings from solving a problem.
- The value of model-building or testing with implications for many programs.
- A test of ways to reduce costs, again with long term financial implications.
Please be specific. We are less interested in broad contributions to values than in specific benefits for people and the organizations that support them.
Enter the broader gains or benefits here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
1000 character maximum
|
The easy answer to this question is that yes we are on course - we have spent half the money and are half way through our work plan. This, however, says nothing about the relationship between money spent and participant progress. The key is to shift the focus from what you are offering to what your participants are getting.
The best answers to this question speak to what you need to see in terms of participant progress at the half way mark that predicts that they will successfully achieve the result at the end of the program/project. Whenever possible look at predictive factors in terms of behaviors rather than attitudes. They are much easier to see and often are the critical points of progress. In some cases, you may also need to have a specified number of persons at the point of full result to predict overall success.
Enter how you will know Law Enforcement Officers are on course here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Law Enforcement Officers.
1000 character maximum
|
|
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
|
Click here for specific instructions on creating your result statement
Enter your results statement here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
2000 character maximum
|
This number is a subset of the overall number of Youth/Adults you plan to serve in your program from question 1 above. For example, if your program/project serves 100 participants overall and you anticipate that 50% of those served will achieve the program result you stated, the number of people reaching the desired program/project result would be 50.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Youth/Adults
|
We urge you go back and forth between this question and the question on your project results such that you state a result that can be verified. One good approach where possible is to build in the measuring stick in the target. For example, of the 80 adults we will serve in this literacy program at least 40 will improve by one full level on the widely respected ABC Scale. The verification is then simple: a comparison of achievement at the beginning and end of the program to see if that one unit gain was realized.
Please note that we are not asking for a formal evaluation. We simply want to know what information or evidence you will use to verify that your stated result has been achieved.
Enter your verification here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
2000 character maximum
|
We believe that our return on grant investment is not the result you achieve. It is the difference between your result and what would have happened without you. It is rarely the case that no one you serve would have achieved a result given other progress and forces at work.
We are not asking you to do original research. Just rely on whatever information exists about outcomes at the most specific level you can get it. Past rates of literacy or academic achievement in a school or neighborhood beat a district or a city. And a city beats a state or the nation. If no information exists, use the most educated guesses you can find - for example from teachers or guidance counselors if your focus is schools.
|
Please enter the number of Youth/Adults that would reach the desired result without this program/project.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
|
You may have benefits to add such as:
- Secondary gains that will come from the primary result you are intending (the documented gains in preventing high school drop out from early grade literacy is an example.)
- The value of building or testing a model that could be replicated by many other organizations.
Enter the broader gains or benefits here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
1000 character maximum
|
The easy answer to this question is that yes we are on course - we have spent half the money and are half way through our work plan. This, however, says nothing about the relationship between money spent and participant progress. The key is to shift the focus from what you are offering to what your participants are getting.
The best answers to this question speak to what you need to see in terms of participant progress at the half way mark that predicts that they will successfully achieve the result at the end of the program/project. Whenever possible look at predictive factors in terms of behaviors rather than attitudes. They are much easier to see and often are the critical points of progress. In some cases, you may also need to have a specified number of persons at the point of full result to predict overall success.
Enter how you will know Youth/Adults are on course here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Youth/Adults.
1000 character maximum
|
|
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
|
Click here for specific instructions on creating your result statement
Enter your results statement here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
750 character maximum
|
This number is a subset of the overall number of Parents/Caregivers you plan to serve in your program from question 1 above. For example, if your program/project serves 100 participants overall and you anticipate that 50% of those served will achieve the program result you stated, the number of people reaching the desired program/project result would be 50.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
|
We urge you go back and forth between this question and the question on your project results such that you state a result that can be verified. One good approach where possible is to build in the measuring stick in the target. For example, of the 80 adults we will serve in this literacy program at least 40 will improve by one full level on the widely respected ABC Scale. The verification is then simple: a comparison of achievement at the beginning and end of the program to see if that one unit gain was realized.
Please note that we are not asking for a formal evaluation. We simply want to know what information or evidence you will use to verify that your stated result has been achieved.
Enter your verification here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
2000 character maximum
|
We believe that our return on grant investment is not the result you achieve. It is the difference between your result and what would have happened without you. It is rarely the case that no one you serve would have achieved a result given other progress and forces at work.
We are not asking you to do original research. Just rely on whatever information exists about outcomes at the most specific level you can get it. Past rates of literacy or academic achievement in a school or neighborhood beat a district or a city. And a city beats a state or the nation. If no information exists, use the most educated guesses you can find - for example from teachers or guidance counselors if your focus is schools.
|
Please enter the number of Parents/Caregivers that would reach the desired result without this program/project.
Enter the total number or use "0" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
|
You may have benefits to add such as:
- Secondary gains that will come from the primary result you are intending (the documented gains in preventing high school drop out from early grade literacy is an example.)
- The value of building or testing a model that could be replicated by many other organizations.
Enter the broader gains or benefits here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
2000 character maximum
|
The easy answer to this question is that yes we are on course - we have spent half the money and are half way through our work plan. This, however, says nothing about the relationship between money spent and participant progress. The key is to shift the focus from what you are offering to what your participants are getting.
The best answers to this question speak to what you need to see in terms of participant progress at the half way mark that predicts that they will successfully achieve the result at the end of the program/project. Whenever possible look at predictive factors in terms of behaviors rather than attitudes. They are much easier to see and often are the critical points of progress. In some cases, you may also need to have a specified number of persons at the point of full result to predict overall success.
Enter how you will know Parents/Caregivers are on course here or use "N/A" if you are not serving Parents/Caregivers.
1000 character maximum
|